The Heathen In His Blindness                                    S. N. Balagangadhara
 
 

Books

Links Research Group Blog


About

Prof. S. N. Balagangadhara is director of the Research Centre Vergelijkende Cultuurwetenschap (Comparative Science of Cultures) in Ghent University, Belgium. He has authored many pieces, including a book titled, "The Heathen in His Blindness" on the nature of religion. His central area of inquiry is to develop a description of the western culture against the background of the Indian culture. He is currently working on a book about ethics: comparing Indian ethics with the western one.

Articles

What not to do?

Perhaps, it is best to begin in an autobiographical mode. I came to (continental) Europe some 25 years ago, naively thinking that `cultural difference' is something that `cosmopolitan' Indians would not experience: after all, I had studied Natural Sciences in India; knew English rather well; was more familiar with the British and European history than I was with that of India (I once had plans to join the IAS by doing exams on these subjects); felt right at home with the western philosophy … It took me about 4 years of living in Europe, without relating to any Indian (or even Asian) community
because I did not want to land up in an emotional and social ghetto, to realise that I was wrong: `cultural differences' were no fictitious invention of anthropologists; it involved more than being a vegetarian or being barefoot at home when the weather was not too cold. This realisation was instrumental in shaping my research project: what makes the Indian culture different from that of the West? (I never felt anything other than an Indian amongst the Europeans.)

In fact, it has been a typical characteristic of western writings on other cultures (including India) to characterise the latter using terms that are only appropriate to describe individual psychologies: X culture is stupid, degenerate, and irrational; Y culture is childish, immature, intuitive, feminine, etc. To simply repeat these mantras after them is to achieve very little understanding. More...

 

Nature of Moral Learning - Yadaa Yadaa hi dharmasya sambhavaami Yuge Yuge

A breath-taking claim about the nature of moral learning in India.. this is what the verses now describe, that: when such a degeneration of the learning process occurs, at some critical phase in the degeneration at the level of society, other mechanisms in society are going to *kick in* and regenerate this learning process (i.e. the process of learning to be moral). More...


India and Her Traditions: A Reply to Jeffrey Kripal

Therefore, I will be interrogating Jeffrey Kripal with respect to one single question: has he produced knowledge or not? I do not believe he has; I believe his stance prevents him from recognizing it; I do not believe he knows either of these two. I will try to provide arguments in defence of these charges. This is my brief. More...
 

India and Her traditions II: An Open Letter to Jeffrey Kripal

In this letter, I will not write everything I want to because there are constraints of size and readability. Therefore, let me tell you beforehand that this letter will merely express my perplexities: why you do not see what you do, why you say one thing and do its oppo-site, why while seeking knowledge you are so eager to embrace ignorance. More...


On Colonial Experience and the Indian Renaissance: A Prolegomenon to a Project

One of the striking things about the British colonial rule is its success in developing certain ways of talking about the Indian culture and society. The British criticised the Indian 'religions', the Indian 'caste system', the Indian education system, practices like 'sati' and 'untouchability', and so on and so forth. They redrew the outlines of Indian intellectual history as indigenous responses to some of the ills they saw in the Indian society and culture. More...


How to Speak for the Indian Traditions: An Agenda for the Future

The article attempts a contrast between the process and the structure of the Christian and the Indian spirituality. Drawing attention to their dissimilarities, it attempts to reformulate the differences among the Indian traditions in a novel way. It argues that cultures and traditions are not just different; rather that they differ from each other in different ways as well. The future of religious studies, it is suggested, is dependent on developing the ability to develop new ways of describing the differences between cultures and traditions. This is the agenda for the future. As a correlate to this task, the article suggests that we replace the question "who speaks ‘for’ and ‘about’ a religion?" with a more pregnant and a more accurate reformulation: "how to speak for a religion in the Academy?" More...
 

“...We Shall Not Cease From Exploration...”

An invitation disguised as a position paper composed at the behest of arena for the theme 'Decolonizing Social Sciences". More...


Colonial Consciousness - An article scheduled to appear soon
 

Some Theses on Colonial Consciousness - Notes by Balu

On Ignorance or Avidya - Half complete thoughts on Avidya - Balu
 

Paper in dutch, which takes on Amartya Sen

File that needs to be converted (Review2.510). .510 seems to be Cthugha 51 file
 

Extracts from sulekha discussions - vnr1995

Balu's responses to Hogan

Balu's responses to Minimus on Sulekha

Balu's responses on Alex's article--Proselytization

Balu's responses on Colonial Experience

Balu's responses on RISA-LILA

Balu's responses regarding the article--India and Her traditions

 

 

Research Group

Yahoo Group: TheHeathenInHisBlindness

The Heathen In His Blindness Forum

 

For the rest who are still blind ...

The Heathen In His Blindness

A review from Amazon:

Although the theory on religion that is submitted in this book is generally found to be highly controversial, Balagangadhara's arguments are so strong that one cannot simply dismiss this theory as intellectual 'spielerei'. His account identifies crucial constraints on Western thinking about other cultures and the social world in general, and convincingly explains why even 'giants and geniusses' have not been able to surmount these constraints. I heartily recommend this fantastic book. In the legendary words of one reader: "it might even change your world view.

 

US: Amazon         Bestbookbuys           Pricegrabber          Froogle

India: Manohar Books

 

Another Review..

This work is most misunderstood by those who approvingly cite this, and by those who criticize this work. This misunderstanding has nothing to do with the structure of the book, but everything to do with the nature of any scientific hypothesis. The author has *not* criticized the concept 'religion' because the latter is western: do we think the concept of positron is western? And this book is not a critique of essentialism: entire natural sciences are `essentialistic.' `culture' is not monolithic; of course, species is not monolithic either, yet is amenable to study. What properties of Christianity are ones by virtue of which Christianity is a religion? Here Sweet Willman, in his criticism of the book, presumed that the properties of Christianity = the properties of religion. There are others who criticize it because it conflicts with their intuition. Of course, the author explained the necessity of experiencing religion in India.

Coming back to what the book does: the author identified a set of problems through historical research. Any theory of religion has to solve these problems. The author proposed a hypothesis of religion that solves these problems, and further explains the experience of believers; that shows why one can't study, say, Christianity as religion without being a believer. Then it is showed, one is compelled to do theology in order to study Christianity as a world view. Given this, the author shifted the study to a different level of abstraction: religion as that which generates a configuration of learning. This hypothesis sheds light on various issues: skepticism of Antiquity; origin of natural sciences in the West; vacuous debates of all sorts of relativism; cultural differences; theories of actions; etc. In other words, this theory does generate more problems, and can solve the same problems-in the long run.

The author nowhere did mention that `Hinduism', `Buddhism' etc. are not `something' else but not religions; whatever conceptual gestalts these entities `Hinduism' etc. refer to are non-existent in the way unicorn is.

 

 

Links

 

Secularism, Colonialism and The Indian Intellectuals - Jakob De Roover

Towards A Positive Portrayal of The Hindu Traditions? - Jakob De Roover

An Unhappy Lover of Theology: Feuerback and Contemporary Religious Studies - Jakob De Roover

How to speak for Indian traditions
Uploaded by: vnr1995


Knowledge and experience - Avinash Jha's reply to Balu's Letter to Kripal
Uploaded by: balagangadhara



Colonial Project of Secular India - A new piece on secularism and colonial consciousness by Jakob, Raf and Esther
Uploaded by:jakobderoover


A Kingdom of Another World Y - Jakob's doctoral dissertation
Uploaded by:jakobderoover


Action+Knowledge - Comparative anthropology and action sciences: an essay on knowing to act and acting to know
Uploaded by: vnr1995

The poverty of theistic cosmology by Adolf Grunbaum
Uploaded by: vnr1995



Heathen QandA.txt - Compilation of Q&A as posted by Jochem
Uploaded by: gktk_us

On the very idea of an intercultural dialogue
Uploaded by: vnr1995

The future of the present. Thinking through Orientalism.
Uploaded by: vnr1995

Said and postcolonialism - An article scheduled to appear soon.
Uploaded by: missblueglimpse